‘Rampa sa Korte Suprema!’ Popular bloggers-influencers run to SC to challenge anti-terror law

July 29, 2020 - 7:12 PM
Group photo of influencers who filed another petition to challenge the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 (JUCRA pool photo)

Local influencers and bloggers were the latest petitioners to challenge the controversial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 before the Supreme Court.

On Wednesday, a total of 19 internet personalities called the Concerned Online Citizens urged the High Court to scrap several provisions in the new counter-insurgency measure as unconstitutional and void.

The group, represented by San Sebastian College of Law Dean Rodel Taton as their legal counsel, also asked the high tribunal to conduct oral arguments on the petition, which was the 21st plea filed since the law’s passage last July 3.

These petitioners with hundreds to thousands of followers on social media platforms are:

  1. Mark Averilla or Macoy Dubs
  2. Community manager Noelle Theresa Capili
  3. Award-winning artist, illustrator and author Robby “Rob” Derrick Cham
  4. Engineer and activist Victor Louis Crisostomo
  5. Blogger and columnist Anthony Ian Cruz or Tonyo Cruz
  6. Marita Dinglasan or Aling Marie
  7. Writer and LGBT advocate Thyssen or Thysz Estrada
  8. Mark Angelo Geronimo or Twitter bhie bhie gurl
  9. Cebu tourism advocate Balbino Pada Guerrero Jr. or Ka Bino Guerrero
  10. Jover Laurio of Pinoy Ako Blog
  11. Agrarian reform campaigner John Carlo Mercado or JC Mercado
  12. Blogger-turned-lawmaker Raymond De Vera Palatino
  13. Lean Redino Porquia of Reklamador Facebook page
  14. Wrier and editor Marcel Dar Stefan Punongbayan
  15. Artist and college student Albert Louis Raqueño
  16. Mindanao blogging community pioneer Oliver Richard Robillo
  17. Blogger advocate Julius or Jhay Rocas
  18. Spoken word artist Juan Miguel Severo
  19. Mental health champion Ma. Gia Grace Sison

Through hashtags #SuetheTurtle and #RampaSaKorteSuprema, a number of them shared photos and videos taken during the filing of the petition.

The former hashtag was similar to the previous hashtag #OustTheTurtle used to counter calls to oust Sen. Kiko Pangilinan.

Critics of the Duterte administration used the it as a substitute to the #OustDuterte online campaign that suddenly gained global traction following President Rodrigo Duterte’s shoot-to-kill remarks against quarantine violators last April.

Creative director Estrada, one of the petitioners, also shared a screenshot of the appeal on her account.

“Kung hindi tayo ngayon magsasalita, kailan pa?” Estrada said.

Mercado, who goes by @darnitJC, on Twitter also shared an artwork showcasing their “Rampa sa Korte Suprema” initiative.

“Exhaust all the means. Labanan ang terorismo ni Duterte!” he said.

Bad track record in labeling terrorists

The group argued that given their vocal commentaries on social media, they could easily be labeled as “terrorists,” “terrorist sympathizers” or “terrorist enablers” with the law in full effect.

They also recalled the instances that Duterte labeled critics as “enemies of the state” and “destabilizers” which consequently put their safety at risk.

“Petitioners can be designated as ‘terrorists’ or ‘terrorist sympathizers’ or ‘terrorist enablers’ are apparent. There is a credible threat of prosecution, it is real,” the petition read.

“The official spokespersons for the government and the President himself have labeled critics as enemies of the state and in a matrix or in televised speeches called them out as terrorists or destabilizers,” it added.

In the plea, the petitioners also cited recent cases wherein there are “arbitrary” applications of laws to individuals who are only exercising their constitutional right to free expression online.

These include the Filipino migrant worker in Taiwan whom a labor attache sought to deport, the arrest and detention of the public school teacher in Olongapo, and the arrest of Cebu artist Maria Victoria Beltran.

Due to the nature of their online content, the influencers also raised the concern on the possibility of being “tracked down, followed, or investigated or having their messages, conversations, discussions, spoken or written words tapped, listened, intercepted and recorded through various means, including computer and network surveillance.”

“The Anti-Terrorism Act presents a clear threat on the free exercise by the citizens-netizens of their fundamental right to speak on issues of national importance, albeit online,” they said.