Baffled? You’re not alone – COP26 spawns confusing array of acronyms

People take part in the 'Global march for climate justice' while environment ministers meet ahead of Glasgow's COP26 meeting, in Milan, Italy, October 2, 2021. (Reuters/Guglielmo Mangiapane/File Photo)

GLASGOW — Do you know your GFANZ from your ISSB from your PPCA? Welcome to COP26!

With truly global initiatives to slash the rate of planetary warming hard to come by, governments, companies and civil society groups are banding together in multiple smaller groups to try and accelerate change.

Keeping track of the cornucopia of new clubs and alliances – each with its own, though sometimes overlapping, aims, is a headache both for outsiders and those inside the U.N. climate conference in Scotland.

Governments have announced each alliance to great fanfare, but behind the scenes, they too are scrambling to keep up.

One official, speaking on condition of anonymity, described updating an announcement repeatedly overnight as more countries were persuaded to join one of the pledges.

Some environmental groups worried important substance was being dropped in such last-minute scrambles, with agreements sounding better than they may turn out to be in practice.

“Assessing their true worth is hugely difficult, especially at speed during a COP meeting,” Mohamed Adow, director of climate justice NGO Power Shift Africa, said in a tweet Thursday.

“They are eye candy but the sugar rush they provide are empty calories,” Adow said.

Others saw the barrage of new partnerships and initiatives as evidence of greater engagement in an issue too long neglected. “We’ve never had as much corporate presence or commitment,” U.S. climate envoy John Kerry said.

Group of groups

There’s the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) – an umbrella group of clubs for insurers, banks, asset managers and other sub-sectors of the finance industry. They say they represent more than $130 trillion in assets, and will be under pressure to meet the need for an estimated $100 trillion in climate finance over the next three decades.

U.N. climate envoy Mark Carney chairs that alliance and has also launched another – the Taskforce on Scaling up Voluntary Carbon Markets (TSVCM) to boost private investment in voluntary carbon offset credits.

John Neal, CEO at Lloyd’s of London, admitted that anyone outside the finance world will be thinking “‘I’ve got no idea what’s going on’.”

“It’s confusing,” he said, but “I know it’s not disingenuous.”

The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), backed by financial market regulators, was also announced on Wednesday and aims to standardize how companies should report on their climate risk exposure and sustainability practices.

On Tuesday, some companies and governments pledged to use their spending power to fuel research and development of climate technologies under a U.S.-led ‘First Movers Coalition’ (FMC).

Confused yet? Those groups are just about the money.

On Thursday, themed “Energy Day” at COP26, non-profit groups said they were busy just “untangling” announcements, such as Britain’s ‘Global Coal to Clean Power Transition Statement’ representing various other energy pledges – some old, some new.

Another new group of 20 countries and five development institutions promised to stop financing fossil fuels overseas; it has yet to give itself a name.


There’s also the ‘Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance’ (BOGA), under which countries will commit next week to ending new oil and gas permits and to winding down production.

Some saw the confusion as coming from the British organizers of the Glasgow conference.

“The UK’s communications strategy in Glasgow … seems designed to dampen transparency” and hinder scrutiny, said Jennifer Morgan, executive director of Greenpeace, in a statement from Glasgow.

The British organizers declined to comment.

The Asian Development Bank’s pilot Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM), meanwhile, aims to accelerate the retirement of coal in southeast Asia by buying off and retiring coal assets.

“The announcements may have taken some un-picking,” said Pauline Heinrichs, policy advisor at the climate think tank E3G. “But they really do represent a tipping point in efforts to consign coal to history,” she added hopefully.

Some observers said financial institutions had made unprecedented commitments to align portfolios, products, and services with the 2015 Paris Agreement, but they were still untested.

“We now need to focus resolutely on the quality of promises made by financial institutions, not just their quantity,” said Ben Caldecott, director of the Oxford Sustainable Finance Group at the University of Oxford. —Reporting by Simon Jessop and Katy Daigle in Glasgow and Valerie Volcovici in Washington D.C.; Editing Philippa Fletcher and Janet Lawrence